In terms of driver access, in view of the high flexibility of online car-hailing and the difficulty of management and control, relatively strict access conditions have been set to maintain public safety to the greatest extent. Specifically, in addition to meeting the driving qualifications, online car-hailing drivers should also meet the conditions of no Conduit CN traffic accident criminal record, no dangerous driving criminal record, no drug use record, no drinking driving record, no violent criminal record, etc. In terms of vehicle access, it is clarified that online car-hailing vehicles should be passenger cars with 7 seats or less, equipped with vehicle satellite positioning devices and emergency alarm devices with driving record function, and the technical performance of vehicles meets the requirements of relevant standards for operational safety.
Also Have the Conduit CN
Interim Measures for the Administration of Online Booking of Taxi Business Services” Let’s see what happened in these two months? On August 1, Didi officially announced the acquisition of Uber China. Let’s explore why the passive form demands Conduit CN more effort. As I told you before, the basic active sentence structure is quite consistent and logical in English. The passive voice turns this all the way around. You first read what was affected. Then you read what happened to it. You discover who or what was responsible only at the very end. This sequence differs from how we usually make sense of events.
Opportunity to Survive Conduit CN
Secondly, the passive voice uses a sentence structure which requires more cognitive effort. Your reader will spend valuable working memory on making sense of the sentence. This decreases the likelihood of you getting your message across. The Ministry of Commerce is currently investigating the merger case. . At the same time, Didi users across the Conduit CN country have experienced the price changes after the acquisition . Many consumers have complained about Didi and Uber’s price hikes, and the Shenzhen Consumer Commission has sent a public letter to the Ministry of Commerce, expressing that they should formally conduct an antitrust investigation into the merger of the two companies.